Fingerprinting | Benefits of Outsourcing Occupational Health Programs


Fingerprinting |   While there are any number of reasons that an employer may desire to conduct medical screening on their employees, employers generally conduct medical screening on their employees for two basic reasons:

1. An employer may be required by regulation to perform some form of medical screening.These regulations are often based on either federal or state laws. Examples of employers subject to such regulations are those in the Transportation, Healthcare, and Mining industries. There are, of course, other regulations and industries that may have the need to conduct medical screening beyond those highlighted here.

2. Create a safer and more effective workforce. The major benefits of these programs are:

  • Reduce absenteeism due to injury
  • Reduce work related injuries
  • Help assess an employee’s ability to safely perform your particular job requirements
  • Reduce employee turnover
  • Establish a baseline health condition for future comparison

While many employers are aware of the need to perform medical screens, some employers may be unaware of the hard costs associated with these types of testing.

Examinations, immunizations, respirator clearance testing, audiograms, and other such related exams all cost money.

One item, however, that employers often overlook is the administration cost of managing these programs.

The costs that employers often miss are:

  • Cost of clinic selection
    • Picking the best clinic at the best price
  • Cost of clinic management
    • Making appointments
    • Tracking down exam statuses
  • Cost of a poor applicant experience (use of an inconvenient clinic)
    • Candidate attraction
    • Employee retention

The cost of clinic selection is an easy concept to appreciate, but it is hard to quantify.

Companies often have static clinics networks that do not change. Over time these clinics often increase their fees.

Since companies do not routinely go out to bid for these occupational health services, these fee increases will cause a substantial increase in their program cost.

Not managing clinic selection could cost companies a substantial amount of money since they are not leveraging their size to help mitigate program cost inflation.

Cost of clinic management for companies is substantial.

In the post offer arena, companies have their Talent Acquisition team manage making clinic appointments for candidates as well as track down occupational health service paperwork.

In the post-employment arena, the responsibility may be managed by another team, but the hard cost remains the same.

The management cost can be quantified by tracking the number of hours the personnel managing the program spends dealing with the clinic.

According to a recent report by Bersin by Deloitte, companies reported that their average talent acquisition cost increased to nearly $4,000 per hire.

A positive candidate experience should definitely be valued while spending this much per person.

If a candidate or employee has a better impression of a company, their employee retention rate may increase as well.

Outsourcing the management of clinic services also coincides with a positive candidate experience, along with other significant cost savings.

When opting to use a third party vendor, the following benefits are appreciated:

    • Clinic Selection – vendors who are in the business of managing clinics may be able to select clinics with the best price point. Vendors also can regularly evaluate clinics for performance and compliance. Even though it is hard to quantify this value, it is easy to appreciate the benefit of using the best clinic at the best rate possible, while also saving you time in the process.


    • Clinic Management – setting appointments and tracking down occupational health service statuses and paperwork cost companies significant amounts of money. The real cost is figured by tracking the number of hours spent managing this program in-house. For example, a large telecommunications company states that they saved over $900,000 in one year by outsourcing their clinic management to a third party. This cost savings was garnered over 10,000 candidates making the savings per candidate around $90. This figure per candidate is most likely pretty standard. Outsourcing the clinic management can be an effective way to mitigate this line item expense.


    • Candidate Experience – using a vendor who can work with your candidates to establish a convenient testing site location will enhance their candidate fingerprinting experience. This positive experience is fostered by individual coordination of the medical screening event. When services are individually coordinated, the candidate feels that they are being treated as an important individual. This may make a positive impression on the new employee which may enhance employee retention rates. The impact of reducing employee turnover, even as little as 1%, is huge when it comes to return on investment. -HireRight

Learn what ESA can do for you! Call 866-830-3724 to discuss fingerprinting services or complete the form on now!